On becoming the change we want to see…

During our new employee orientation the following question is asked, “How many of you are librarians?” A handful of people will raise their hands. The rest will squirm in their seats waiting, wondering what’s coming next. “To our customers we are all librarians” is the next thing new staff hear.With that statement you see a smile emerge and tension melt away.

When a customer walks through the door he or she does not care what initials you have behind your name. The customer wants service or information and all staff should be ready to provide it.

This is not meant to devalue or disrespect the MLS. But working in a library is kind of like working in a hospital (yep I’ve done both). When you work in a hospital whether you are an MD, RN, EMT, or CNA everyone is going to ask you for medical advice. In the library everyone is going to ask you for information. The key to both situations is knowing the basics and when to refer to someone else.

As an EMT I can administer and advise you on basic first aid. If you need an opinion about which medication to take for insomnia I’m going to refer you to a doctor or pharmacist.

As a library employee I can help you find the restrooms, help you with the Internet, and show you where the cookbooks are. But if you need to know the best resource for obtaining your great-great-grandfather’s Civil War records I’m going to refer you to a librarian.

All customers of any business or organization have two basic expectations:

  1. Be greeted in a friendly, polite manner and offered basic assistance and triage.
  2. Assisted referral* to the appropriate person for specific information. *Assisted referral is very different from a “blind transfer” or just sending someone to the 3rd floor. Assisted referral means remaining with that customer until you can explain the need to the person who can help so the customer does not have to repeat his request 3 times.

Like it or not a library is a business. We have budgets. We have strategic planning. Some of us have our own finance, IT and HR departments.

In a business you need a variety of experts with broad educational backgrounds. I went through a listing of graduate degrees at my university and selected some that could easily fit within the mission and goals of libraries. I hope that you can see how the diversity and wealth of information from all of these fields could benefit a library and libraries in general.

While many library staff do not hold an MLS their contributions are essential to making libraries a success. When I first began working in libraries 9-years-ago I was put off by the terminology used to designate between MLS/non MLS, professional/paraprofessional, librarians/support staff. Coming from the business world I was not accustomed to this segregation. In the business world employees are valued for their unique abilities and contributions to the team. No one ever asked me what my degree was or if I even had one.

Without an MLS, do I love the library any less? Do I work less hard? Do I advocate any less for intellectual freedom? No.

In fact I have always wanted to work in a library. At one point I wanted to be a librarian. But I’ve discovered that my passion is in learning, helping other people learn, and connecting people with technology. With that in mind which would benefit me, the library, and my customers more–a library science degree or an instructional technology or education degree?

I hope that someday soon we do not even make the distinction and have to come up with words do describe MLS/non MLS. I know in my own training curriculum I’ve considered offering more advanced training for librarians and more basic training for other staff. In the end I decided the best way to handle this was to be clear in the program descriptions and objectives who the training is for and what is going to be covered. Staff can decide for themselves which level of training to attend. It’s worked great so far. Free learning for everyone. Isn’t that what libraries are all about?

An update regarding my last post. I have it from good authority that the Emerging Leaders Taskforce is going take another look at their requirements for the ALA Emerging Leaders Program. I hope they will also consider Sarah’s views.

Meredith suggested I formally contact ALA. I plan to.

Paul provided some very encouraging words about working together for change. I just recently renewed my ALA membership and joined the CLENE roundtable. I’m hoping to find a place with that group where I can contribute to ALA.

Jeff again reminded me that quitting ALA is not the answer, and after much thought I agree. As a wise man once said, We must become the change we want to see.”

Why I will not renew my ALA membership next year

The announcement I just received from ALA about the application for Emerging Leaders is the final straw in my decision to not renew my ALA membership next year.

The description of the program sounds exciting to someone who is eager to get involved in ALA:

The program is designed to enable more than 100 new librarians to get on the fast track to ALA and professional leadership. Participants are given the opportunity to work on a variety of projects, network with peers, and get an inside look into ALA structure and activities.

But then I read the requirements:

  1. Be under 35 years of age or be a new librarian of any age with fewer than 5 years post-MLS experience, and
  2. Have a recent MLS degree from an ALA or NCATE accredited program or be in an MLS program currently, and
  3. Be able to attend both ALA conferences and work virtually in between each,
  4. Be prepared to commit to serve on an ALA, Division, Chapter, or Round Table committee, taskforce or workgroup upon completion of program, and
  5. Be an ALA member or join upon selection if not already a member.

So ALA will happily take the money from library “support staff” (BTW I hate that term) for membership but does not allow those same members to apply for leadership opportunities within ALA such as this one. Isn’t this the American Library Association (as opposed to the American Librarian Association)? When will ALA recognize that not all library “professionals” have nor need an MLS.

No thank you.