On becoming the change we want to see…

During our new employee orientation the following question is asked, “How many of you are librarians?” A handful of people will raise their hands. The rest will squirm in their seats waiting, wondering what’s coming next. “To our customers we are all librarians” is the next thing new staff hear.With that statement you see a smile emerge and tension melt away.

When a customer walks through the door he or she does not care what initials you have behind your name. The customer wants service or information and all staff should be ready to provide it.

This is not meant to devalue or disrespect the MLS. But working in a library is kind of like working in a hospital (yep I’ve done both). When you work in a hospital whether you are an MD, RN, EMT, or CNA everyone is going to ask you for medical advice. In the library everyone is going to ask you for information. The key to both situations is knowing the basics and when to refer to someone else.

As an EMT I can administer and advise you on basic first aid. If you need an opinion about which medication to take for insomnia I’m going to refer you to a doctor or pharmacist.

As a library employee I can help you find the restrooms, help you with the Internet, and show you where the cookbooks are. But if you need to know the best resource for obtaining your great-great-grandfather’s Civil War records I’m going to refer you to a librarian.

All customers of any business or organization have two basic expectations:

  1. Be greeted in a friendly, polite manner and offered basic assistance and triage.
  2. Assisted referral* to the appropriate person for specific information. *Assisted referral is very different from a “blind transfer” or just sending someone to the 3rd floor. Assisted referral means remaining with that customer until you can explain the need to the person who can help so the customer does not have to repeat his request 3 times.

Like it or not a library is a business. We have budgets. We have strategic planning. Some of us have our own finance, IT and HR departments.

In a business you need a variety of experts with broad educational backgrounds. I went through a listing of graduate degrees at my university and selected some that could easily fit within the mission and goals of libraries. I hope that you can see how the diversity and wealth of information from all of these fields could benefit a library and libraries in general.

While many library staff do not hold an MLS their contributions are essential to making libraries a success. When I first began working in libraries 9-years-ago I was put off by the terminology used to designate between MLS/non MLS, professional/paraprofessional, librarians/support staff. Coming from the business world I was not accustomed to this segregation. In the business world employees are valued for their unique abilities and contributions to the team. No one ever asked me what my degree was or if I even had one.

Without an MLS, do I love the library any less? Do I work less hard? Do I advocate any less for intellectual freedom? No.

In fact I have always wanted to work in a library. At one point I wanted to be a librarian. But I’ve discovered that my passion is in learning, helping other people learn, and connecting people with technology. With that in mind which would benefit me, the library, and my customers more–a library science degree or an instructional technology or education degree?

I hope that someday soon we do not even make the distinction and have to come up with words do describe MLS/non MLS. I know in my own training curriculum I’ve considered offering more advanced training for librarians and more basic training for other staff. In the end I decided the best way to handle this was to be clear in the program descriptions and objectives who the training is for and what is going to be covered. Staff can decide for themselves which level of training to attend. It’s worked great so far. Free learning for everyone. Isn’t that what libraries are all about?

An update regarding my last post. I have it from good authority that the Emerging Leaders Taskforce is going take another look at their requirements for the ALA Emerging Leaders Program. I hope they will also consider Sarah’s views.

Meredith suggested I formally contact ALA. I plan to.

Paul provided some very encouraging words about working together for change. I just recently renewed my ALA membership and joined the CLENE roundtable. I’m hoping to find a place with that group where I can contribute to ALA.

Jeff again reminded me that quitting ALA is not the answer, and after much thought I agree. As a wise man once said, We must become the change we want to see.”

Why I will not renew my ALA membership next year

The announcement I just received from ALA about the application for Emerging Leaders is the final straw in my decision to not renew my ALA membership next year.

The description of the program sounds exciting to someone who is eager to get involved in ALA:

The program is designed to enable more than 100 new librarians to get on the fast track to ALA and professional leadership. Participants are given the opportunity to work on a variety of projects, network with peers, and get an inside look into ALA structure and activities.

But then I read the requirements:

  1. Be under 35 years of age or be a new librarian of any age with fewer than 5 years post-MLS experience, and
  2. Have a recent MLS degree from an ALA or NCATE accredited program or be in an MLS program currently, and
  3. Be able to attend both ALA conferences and work virtually in between each,
  4. Be prepared to commit to serve on an ALA, Division, Chapter, or Round Table committee, taskforce or workgroup upon completion of program, and
  5. Be an ALA member or join upon selection if not already a member.

So ALA will happily take the money from library “support staff” (BTW I hate that term) for membership but does not allow those same members to apply for leadership opportunities within ALA such as this one. Isn’t this the American Library Association (as opposed to the American Librarian Association)? When will ALA recognize that not all library “professionals” have nor need an MLS.

No thank you.

DRM you will not win

It was with much excitement that I received a shiny, new iPod nano for Mother’s Day. If there was ever a year I deserved an extravagant celebration of being a mom, this would be the year. (I may argue this point in about 16 years.)

Having developed the training for our staff and patrons on using NetLibrary I was well aware of the fact that downloadable audiobooks will not play on an ipod. NetLibrary and OverDrive both use a specific format that is not readable by iPods. I am totally clear on this and understand the rationale behind it.

I was still excited about my gift, and I was sure there would be a way to crack the DRM so I can listen to audiobooks.

Disclaimer: Can I just say that I am not a criminal. I am not going to distribute copies of audiobooks. I simply want to listen to them on my shiny, new iPod. The same device that the majority of consumers use for listening to digital audio. Between my husband and I we have three other MP3 players that will play these same audiobooks. Why don’t I use one of those? Because they do not allow you to bookmark your place in a book. So if you stop in the middle of an 8-hour book you have to fast forward to your place each time you go back to the book. The other morning it took me 30-minutes to find my place in Tipping Point. By that time I was at work and had to turn the system off. The publishers are not losing money from sales to me. iTunes is not losing money from me. I am legally checking out items through my library account. Why oh why do they need to be locked down.

From the OCLC site:

Attention iPod and Zune users:
NetLibrary eAudiobooks cannot be played on the Apple iPod or Microsoft Zune at this time. Those players use technology that is incompatible with the DRM (Digital Rights Management) that protects the eAudiobook content and allows it to expire on the due date.

Ironically I have never had a NetLibrary audiobook expire on my old MP3 player. I’ve had one book on it for a few years now.

I was excited to learn that OverDrive will soon be offering MP3 downloads to iPod users. However if you research this further it will only be 15% of their collection and it will only be a select group of new items. Existing items will not be converted to MP3. The MP3 titles will only allow one copy – one user which means that you may have to wait a while, a long while, to listen to a book. No word yet from NetLibrary on whether they will follow suit.

So what does this leave one to do?

  • Return the iPod? Can’t do that as the box has been opened. Besides it is much better than the other MP3 players I’ve used!
  • Buy software that will strip the DRM and convert the NetLibrary/OverDrive files to MP3? I’ve tested this and it works. It’s an option, but I’m hesitant for pay for software to fix a problem that should not exist in the first place.
  • Install freeware that plays the NetLibrary/OverDrive files and rerecords them as an MP3? I can’t even believe that such a thing exists! I’ve tried it and it works. It takes a long time, but you can schedule it to run over night. You lose a little sound quality, but it’s not even noticeable for an audiobook.

Regardless of whether we personally use iPods or not we need to be activists for our patrons customers. The iPod has 70% of the market share for MP3 players. There is a campaign encouraging libraries to embargo companies that distribute media with DRM. While I personally don’t think we need to go as far as an all out embargo, we do need to let our vendors know that our customers want to listen to downloadable audio on the devices that they own–not just on a few select devices. Along with that iPod and Zune users need to contact Apple and Microsoft and demand that each device stop limiting the file formats they can play.

Random House wised up and dropped DRM on their audiobooks after they found that no one was pirating DRM protected downloads. Hopefully the other companies will wise up too!

Technology Training and Competencies for Libraries

Are you doing tech training for your staff? What challenges are you facing? What successes have you had? I would love to hear your story and thoughts. Please comment or email me at reedlori “at” gmail.com. I’ll be glad to read your responses or set up a time to call you.

By the way Sarah Houghton-Jan gave another fabulous OPAL presentation today on Technology Training and Competencies for Libraries. If you missed it check the OPAL Archives to view a recording. Sarah had a lot of great ideas to share whether you are just beginning or have an established technology competencies program.

Comment Challenge Day 7

Day 7: Reflect on what you’ve learned so far.

Hmmm. I will start out by saying this is a lot of work! All of it. Blogging, reading blogs, and providing meaningful comments. Luckily a wise person once told me to stop watching TV. I took her advice and I have lots of time for fun things like this.

I think the key to being successful in this community is you have to manage your time well. It’s so funny how often this world reflects the real world. In the real world I would not spend hours flipping through hundreds of magazines looking for interesting articles. Instead I would pick a few favorites, read them thoroughly, and occasionally try a new one out.

For me I think blogging needs to be the same. For the past year I have subscribed to almost every library or training blog I’ve come across. That might help explain my 611 feeds. I will admit I don’t read all of them. There are a few that I read daily. The rest I skim for information. I have this fear of missing out on something. But I’ve come to realize that as long as I subscribe to a few select blogs I won’t miss anything! The biblioblogosphere is good about sharing information!

So my task will be to pare down the feeds. I am not going to unsubscribe. Instead I am going to rearrange my folders so that my favorite blogs are in their own folder and focus my time on those. I’ll also work on narrowing down my search feeds. Do I really need to see every post that has the words library and training? Probably not.

So while my reflection has little to do with the comment challenge, it sets me on the path to being able to be a better commenter by focusing my attention.

I’d love to hear from some of the other bibliobloggers who I’m sure have massive amounts of feeds. How much time do you spend a day reading feeds? Do you read all of them? Do you filter feeds with searches? What other tips can you share with the rest of us who suffer from too many blogs, too little time?

Michael Stephens, Meredith Farkas, Helene Blowers, Sarah Houghton-Jan, Jenny Levine just to name a few. Anyone else please feel free to comment too!

  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Flickr
  • Pinboard
Stop censorship